A Integridade ética, inteligência artificial generativa e ensino superior.
Tensões, desafios e horizontes pedagógicos.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32870/punto.v12i23.322Palavras-chave:
integridade ética, inteligência artificial generativa, ensino superior, ética docenteResumo
A rápida adoção da inteligência artificial generativa está remodelando profundamente os padrões éticos. Este artigo analisa criticamente a conduta profissional dos professores universitários, as tensões que a IAG suscita em relação à integridade acadêmica e as respostas que estão sendo consideradas pelas instituições. Defendemos que tais desafios exigem não apenas regras, mas também uma formação que contribua para o desenvolvimento da consciência moral, da autonomia intelectual e da responsabilidade pelo conhecimento.
Referências
Acosta-Enríquez, B. G.; Arbulú-Ballesteros, M. A. y Hernández-Soto, M. (2024). Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived Ethics regarding the use of ChatGPT among generation Z university students. Int J Educ Integr 20, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00157-4
Alonso-Rodríguez, A. M. (2024). Hacia un marco ético de la inteligencia artificial en la educación. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuni-versitaria, 36 (2), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.31821
Bender, E. M.; Gebru, T.; McMillan-Major, A. y Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? En Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610–623). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Bertram-Gallant, T. (2008). Academic integrity in the twenty-first century: A teaching and learning imperative. Jossey-Bass.
Buxarrais, M. R. y Tey, A. (2019). La cara ética del buen maestro: Ethos docente, identidad profesional y liderazgo moral. Algunos datos. Temps d’Educació, 57, 91–109.
Celik, I. (2022). Towards intelligent-tPaCK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (ai)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 135, Article 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
Comisión Europea [European Commission] (2020). Libro blanco sobre la inteligencia artificial: Un enfoque europeo orientado a la excelencia y la confianza. Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea.
Comisión Europea [European Commission] (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. Directorate-Gene-ral for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/153756
Comisión Europea [European Commission] (2026). Guidelines on the ethical use of artificial intelligence and data in teaching and learning for educators. Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2766/7967834
Consejo de Europa [Council of Europe]. (2024). Regulating the use of artificial intelligence systems in education: Preparatory study on the development of a legal instrument. https://www.coe.int/en/web/education/artificial-intelligence
Consejo de Europa [Council of Europe] (2025). 2nd Working Conference Regulating the use of AI systems in education. [Conference report]. https://www.coe.int/en/web/education/artificial-intelligence
Cotton, D. R. E.; Cotton, P. A. y Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 61 (2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Eaton, S. E. (2021). Plagiarism in higher education: Tackling tough topics in academic integrity. Libraries Unlimited.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Furze, L.; Perkins, M.; Roe, J. y MacVaugh, J. (2024). The ai Assess-ment Scale (aias) in action: A pilot implementation of GenAI-supported assessment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (4), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9434
García-Peñalvo, F. J.; Casañ-Guerrero, M. J.; Alier-Forment, M. y Pereira-Varela, J. A. (2025). La ética de la inteligencia artificial generativa en educación a debate: Perspectiva desde el desarrollo de un caso de estudio teórico-práctico. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 83 (291), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.22550/2174-0909.4577
Hagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of ai ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30 (1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8
Helberger, N. y Diakopoulos, N. (2023). ChatGPT and the AI Act. Internet Policy Review, 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.1.1682
ICAI, International Center for Academic Integrity. (2021). The fundamental values of academic integrity (3rd ed.). International Center for Academic Integrity.
Kumar, R. (2023). Faculty members’ use of artificial intelligence to grade student papers: A case of implications. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00130-7
Miao, F. y Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. unEsCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084
Miao, F. y Holmes, W. (2024). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. unEsCO.
Moya, B.; Eaton, S.; Pethrick, H.; Hayden, A.; Brennan, R.; Wiens, J. y McDermott, B. (2024). Academic integrity and artificial intelligence in higher education contexts: A rapid scoping review. Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity, 7 (3). https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/cpai.v7i3.78123
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Sin fines de lucro: Por qué la democracia necesita de las humanidades (M. V. Rodil, Trad.). Katz.
OCdE, Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos. (2023). Opportunities, guidelines and guardrails for effective and equitable use of AI in education. Secretariat, & Education Interna-tional. OECd. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/ projects/edu/smart-data-and-digital-technology-in-education/ Opportunities%2C%20guidelines%20and%20guardrails%20for%20 effective%20and%20equitable%20use%20of%20AI%20in%20 education.pdf
UNESCO, Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2022). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. unEsCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380455
UNESCO, Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (2024). AI competency framework for students. unEsCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391105
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Rosa, Tomás Peralta

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
De acuerdo con la legislación de derechos de autor, Punto Cunorte reconoce y respeta el derecho moral de los autores, así como la titularidad del derecho patrimonial. Bajo la iniciativa de Budapest de acceso abierto, el autor otorga derechos conexos a la Universidad de Guadalajara, al Centro Universitario del Norte y a la revista Punto Cunorte para su difusión en acceso abierto. Punto Cunorte no realiza cargos a los autores por enviar y procesar artículos para su publicación.
Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en Punto Cunorte (por ejemplo incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en Punto Cunorte.
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.







